Victimhood and the Weight of Creation
Just This That Is Happening
August 26, 2026
dialogue

Victimhood and the Weight of Creation

La victimización y el peso de la creación

A question about the shift in responsibility that accompanies awakening, and how suffering depends on some hidden sense of being a victim.

Victimhood and the Weight of Creation

A question about the shift in responsibility that accompanies awakening, and how suffering depends on some hidden sense of being a victim.

You just mentioned a shift in responsibility. Could you say a bit more about that, in which way it's shifting? I feel like there are a lot of fears coming up, and I've been looking at that, feeling it in the body. We spoke briefly about that resistance, just sitting with it and recognizing that something in me doesn't want it. I'm curious what you meant about responsibility being connected to all of this.

It's a difficult topic to speak of generally, because it's the kind of thing that resembles ethics. There is no book. Any book of ethics is a dogma, a religion. Historically useful to humanity, but only as a stepping stone toward truer ethics, toward truer responsibility. So responsibility is very much tied to ethics, and it's very much tied to truth: what is true, what is real, what is loving. That makes it easier to speak about what is not that. What is not responsibility. What is irresponsibility.

The position of victimhood

On the polar side of irresponsibility is a position of victimhood. Now, there are exceptions where that word is used in a very factual sense. If somebody breaks into my house and attacks me, I am a victim of whatever that would be called. In that specific sense, it's very appropriate. If someone or something is perpetrating an action toward me, and I am on the receiving end, there is an accuracy in saying I am the victim of that action. But that's about it.

The rest is why I talk about it, because I'm not here to teach ethics specifically. It matters because it is at the heart of suffering. In order for me to suffer, a few conditions need to be met. One of them is that what I am is, in some sense, a victim of something. The word "victim" doesn't have to appear in the internal narrative, but there will be some form of imagination or dynamic where I am a victim of something. Even in the case where I am attacked by a robber, and technically it's correct that I am a victim, there can still be a narrative that creates suffering around that event.

The narrative of the one who cannot

If we set aside a complex scenario like that and look at ordinary life, where there isn't such a specific situation, it becomes the creation of a narrative: a person who is unable to do XYZ because of some circumstance. It often centers on certain themes we have a preference for. Some people prefer to focus on worldly things, government and politics, or certain groups of people, or certain family situations, or the relationship situation, or the employer situation. Add a couple more, and that covers pretty much 99% of the suffering of humanity, in terms of the topics.

So, generally speaking, when that is the narrative, there is a position of being a victim. Freedom requires that identity of victim to end, to be seen through, or seen as an attachment. By being attached to it, we become not only irresponsible, but exempt from having to take any responsibility. Correctly irresponsible. It's a position of certainty, a position of false knowing, of "it is not up to me."

Responsibility grows with realization

I have found that with every glimpse and shift of realization, awakening, freedom, peace, love, and beauty, everything in that movement came with greater and greater responsibility. Not only requiring it, but almost demanding it. It's hard to say which came first, the stepping into responsibility or the realization. I'm not sure.

There's also a place where it's very truthful to speak of there being no responsibility. But I'm speaking at the level of relativity versus the absolute. I can speak on a level where there is no responsibility: it's all God, and nothing is up to us. That's one side. If that's the only side spoken, it's partial, and it's not complete.

So that's the growing up, and the other is the waking up.

In a sense, yes. The growing up is the responsibility. Let me say this really directly. These are only words, but sometimes you need a lot of words to say things more truthfully, because any simple statement is further from the truth. Still, I could say it simply: the recognition that what I am is the creator of what is. That's a very poor way of describing a true realization. The instant I put it in words like that, it's not it, but it's also it. Said that way, who is responsible, if not me, for that creation?

And to complete it, I also have to say: there is nothing of what I am that has anything to do with what's happening. Nothing is up to me.

The deeper desire

Going more specifically into the growing up: why are you here? What are you? Who am I? Why am I here? Not this, not this, not this. Neti neti neti. Why am I here? What do I want? Not my mind, not my body, not the desire to avoid fear and pain. Not that. A deeper desire. What do I want? What does the universe, as myself or through this body-mind, want when it is aligned with the heart, through the heart, in total freedom?

If that's not lived, if that's not recognized (and it's not a thing to recognize; it's a deep listening, a deep attunement), if that's not where I'm moving from, there will be suffering, there will be illusion. That suffering and that illusion only end when there is a deeper surrender to what I truly want. In a sense, the suffering is there to remind you, to shake you and shake you until you see the illusion, drop it, step up, grow up, and live freely.

If fear and pain were candy

Risk. It's all about avoiding fear and pain, all of the struggle, all of the illusion. If you stopped needing to avoid fear and pain, what would you live? How would you live? Imagine the most unimaginable, horrible fear and pain, and that it was just like candy to you. What would you do? Because it actually is. That's the awakening side. If you realize that physical torture, all the heartbreaking loss of my wants and desires, all of it, is handled, then what?

Do I waste energy avoiding candies with flavors I don't prefer, or do I just eat them when they come?

So eating them is the good thing to do.

Eat them when they come. Don't go looking for them.

Don't go to the sweet shop.

Well, go to a sweet shop, but don't go stepping in front of a bus to digest the candy of pain. When it's in, it's in. The journey of that deeper desire comes with it.

Imagination used for creation

Ultimately, this sounds very grand, but it's actually simple. What do you really want? There's always something. There's always some creative impulse, a creative vision of love, of bringing something more beautiful into this world. Whether it's a project, whether it's art, whether it's both, whether it's a relationship. Usually ordinary. Sometimes they become extraordinary. Is it a book? Is it something else? I say this because it could be anything. It's infinite in form. For any individual there are infinite ways, and now there are so many individuals. It's absolute infinite creativity available right now, through your imagination.

So instead of imagining a character that needs to avoid feeling pain and struggling to do so, use the imagination for what it's for, which is creation. How to bring more love, beauty, and truth into your whole body, mind, surroundings, and everything you can imagine with the capabilities of your intelligence, your creativity, and your love. That's responsibility.

An example of it lived

As you were saying all that, throughout this conversation I kept thinking about Dolly Parton, who died yesterday, and seeing all the comments and the talk about her. I felt like she embodied exactly what you're describing, the way she was in the world.

That's the result of someone who, in the ordinary, is extraordinary. Just her songs completely affected humanity, so beautiful, so much love. That's why the response was what it was: just the love.

She allowed herself to be a channel for that love and generosity.

Exactly. You could say she was totally responsible for herself. I don't know her private life, but to a very large degree, I have no doubt she was of high responsibility, high integrity. I don't know her story. I'm sure there were likely places of struggle, distress, fears, and pains. I just don't know. But when there are those extraordinary beings, it means that in certain parts of their lives, at least, they were living in total freedom and total stability.

Thank you.

You're welcome.