The Disappointment of Seeing Through
The Dreamer, the Dream, and What Is Not at Risk
October 21, 2026
dialogue

The Disappointment of Seeing Through

La decepción de ver a través

A student describes a chain of insights into how everything is constructed, followed by a mild depression and a nihilistic mood. The teacher explains why disillusionment is a common and almost necessary stage, how nihilism is itself another form of false knowing, and what signs indicate a genuine freeing up.

The Disappointment of Seeing Through

A student describes a chain of insights into how everything is constructed, followed by a mild depression and a nihilistic mood. The teacher explains why disillusionment is a common and almost necessary stage, how nihilism is itself another form of false knowing, and what signs indicate a genuine freeing up.

That meditation was a pretty apt one for where I've been recently. Let me explain. There's been a chain of insights, all relating to nothing being known, or more like seeing how everything is constructed, or at least seeing the layer of construction for what it is.

I guess it's had a nihilistic vibe. Mild depression, not feeling very driven spiritually at all, although it's wearing off now. It hasn't been too bad. I can imagine that ten or twenty years ago, if I'd felt what I've been feeling, I'd probably have spiraled a bit. So it's been curious to watch. I guess nihilism is more of a belief system, isn't it? But it has that vibe, after seeing more clearly that it's all made up. Maybe it's just the wake of that kind of insight. So when you started that meditation, I thought, "Oh no. Not this again." That's where I'm at at the moment.

Disillusionment as part of the path

It's very common, and almost necessary. What we're trying to address here is illusion, right? What is not real. And suffering comes from illusion only.

You could take an approach that is purely a love of truth, which is what philosophy originally meant. But it can also be approached from the point of view of affect. These aren't separate paths; they're just methods and approaches. The Buddhist approach is about ending suffering, and in that approach you'll never end suffering tomorrow. You can end it in what is here now, by seeing what is not real, by seeing illusion. This implies that if we're suffering, we are in an illusion in some form.

There's another word for this: disillusion. It isn't known as a positive word, and it isn't experienced as a positive word. It's experienced as disappointment. When illusions end, depending on the kind of illusion and the depth at which it ends, it's not pleasant. So there's a transitionary period, and it can be experienced in all kinds of ways. It could be terrifying or excruciatingly painful. It could involve a lot of grief. It could also be nihilism, the ending of meaning, because whatever gave us meaning was tied and bound to that illusion.

For example, as a child, the meaning in my life is to be a good boy and receive the present I most want from Santa Claus. Then finding out that Santa Claus isn't real can be a little unpleasant.

Preparation, deconstruction, release

Most of these approaches work this way: first there is a preparation, then a deconstruction. Most of the successful traditions begin with a preparation of body, mind and life, followed by a deconstruction, not of reality, but of assumed reality, false reality. The deconstruction can't be brought too early to a mind or psyche that isn't mature and ready for it. There's no way to define exactly what that readiness is, but some preparation is often required.

Then, when the deconstruction comes to a close, to a more total deconstruction, there is a shift. It is a release from that illusion, a freedom and a peace and a well-being that was not known before. That is, in a sense, the carrot at the end of the stick. If it's recognized very deeply, it will be seen that it always was known, always was real and always was present. But in the transition, to the body-mind, it's encountered as something new. Only later is it recognized as more totally always here.

One way this transition has been addressed is as "the dark night." There's a book, The Dark Night of the Soul, that describes different dark nights: the dark night of the senses, of the spirit, of the soul. These are endings of illusions of a deeper nature, where a certain kind of darkness comes.

Nihilism as another form of knowing

But the darkness itself, as you mentioned, is a bit of a belief system. The sense that there is no meaning is a belief system. It's a definition regarding meaning: that there is none. I'm describing the semantics of that definition in a more extreme form, and we can be more or less in that space. But the more there is a sense of nihilism, the more there is actually a knowing, a false knowing of reality.

At one extreme, the false knowing is: "There is meaning, I know what it is, and it's exactly this thing, or this group of things." That can be deconstructed, and it can be seen that there isn't any inherent meaning in any of that. Then the mind does this: "Oh, so there is no meaning." That again is a knowing, a false knowing.

There is no meaning implicitly in breathing. There is no meaning implicitly in coffee, as if that were what is meaningful in life. No particular aspect of life is the meaning of life. But the opposite isn't true either, that nothing is meaningful. In a sense, nothing is meaningful and everything is meaningful, and then you can't even know.

There's a saying: "The son of man has nowhere to rest his head." Resting one's head means settling in one of these places of thought and concept about where meaning is, where the answer to the question of meaning is X, Y or Z. I am resting my head there.

Like a hook or a landing place. What was curious, remembering a few of the insights as they happened, was that there was a recognition, and then the feeling tone came first. The thought came after: "There's no inherent meaning to anything." Was that feeling, and then that thought, just a reaction from ego more than anything?

Yes, but it's not a bad thing. It's often a necessary process. Part of it is that the body-mind is attached to certain narratives of meaning, and when those are seen to be empty of such meaning, there is an adjustment, a rebalancing. There could be different forms of what we can call negative affect: loss, grief, disillusionment, disappointment, fear, worry and so on. There will also be narratives that try to manage and compensate.

So yes, there isn't inherent meaning in anything. But that doesn't mean there is no meaning in the more nihilistic sense, the extreme of "Everything is meaningless, so why live?"

Exactly. There is meaning there because the mind makes it up, it feels like. Which is cool, actually. It's beautiful in a way.

And when nothing specifically is the source of meaning, then everything that is happening at any moment can be lived fully and intimately. Its beauty can be seen for what it is. It's mysterious, but it's not meaningless.

Often that negative reaction, if it becomes established as a center, is just another form of knowing, an identity and a form of resistance. It's often an avoidance of the pain of the disappointment or the disillusionment.

There's been some grief with it as well. And a moment of fear: fear of insanity, or "How can anything function without meaning?" It wasn't quite those words, but it was that sense.

Growing out of attachments

Yes, I get it. If that process is allowed to move in the way it moves, which is mysterious, something new will come.

I use childhood examples because we can all remember or imagine something similar; we've lived through this multiple times growing up. As a child, we are completely consumed by a certain toy, a certain game or some kind of imagination. Then we grow out of it, and there is a lot of grief, struggle and challenge. Then something just happens, and it becomes a memory: "Oh yes, I was really attached to that toy." For some it's finding out Santa Claus isn't real. We see all these struggles in children as they grow up: an attachment to a relationship or a friend that is consumingly devastating when it's lost. Then some time later it's only a memory, because we have grown into something else.

This is similar, but deeper and more total. No particular aspect of life is any longer what we look to for pleasure or meaning. When we seek in a specific experience, whether a hobby, a person or a thing, it's either something I have that I need to keep having, and if I don't, things are not okay; or something I don't have that I need to find. So it's always future-related.

So it's a kind of fantasy of thought.

Yes. That is different from simply whatever is happening now, and whatever will be happening at any moment.

I still sense that tendency here, though. I get good feelings from thinking about going for a surf, or doing a particular job.

Movement without lack

When we aren't attached to any particular thing, there is a deeper wisdom in what arises and feels like the direction of love, interest and curiosity. So in any particular moment there will be things, simple or not so simple: a coffee, a walk, a surf.

So that thought pattern can continue, but the attachment is different?

Yes, and it's often less a thought and more of a feeling, as you said. It isn't initiated by the thought or the image. The clarity of it is that it isn't something missing, as in "I will be okay once I get there." There's simply a movement toward whatever is felt.

It feels a lot more like the body saying yes, rather than the mind.

Even deeper. It's like deeper layers of the body's felt sense, where there's an expansiveness and a fullness and a lovingness to it. It's not exclusively the body, but the body responds.

Before the freeing up, the body and the mind will be drawn to attachment and the addictions of seeking. When we've gone through the freeing up in the body and the mind, they can be very attuned to this. The body and the mind will be aligned and moving with what feels right. It's very spontaneous.

Signs of alignment

One way you can recognize this is that there isn't a sense of lack or something missing at a deep level. There's also a sense that anything is possible, an openness, even mentally and conceptually.

Like you could go this way, or that way, or another way.

Yes. It becomes very spontaneous, explorational and experimental: "What about this? What about that?" That is different from habit. Even walking down the street, we can see a habit of always going the same way.

More playful.

More playful, more exploratory, spontaneous. Another sign, which I learned from one teacher, is synchronicities: positive reinforcement from the world, from experience beyond just what's happening here. That signals that what is being listened to at the level of the body-mind is aligned with a universal movement. The synchronicities can be of all kinds: things go well, or there are telepathic experiences, anything that signals something beyond the appearance of separation, any kind of positive alignment with what is beyond that sense of separation.

Yes, I know that space. It feels like fear doesn't come into it either.

The experience of fear becomes more superficial, and the deep fear can completely vanish. Fear becomes dreamlike, as when we're watching a movie or riding a roller coaster. It can be very intense, but something deep is okay; it's not threatened. And this isn't from a belief about not being vulnerable. There simply isn't a sense of something that's a threat.

The risk of losing empathy

I have to mention another sign, and it's an important one: there still remains a very deep sense of empathy, of sensitivity to what's right, and of ethics toward others. I've seen that a lot of this freeing up can happen and then there can be a loss of sensitivity to the experience of others, a loss of empathy and respect.

That points toward shadow work.

Yes, exactly. When that happens, it's shadow work. Nihilism is a kind of identity, and this is also an identity based on a belief, but a belief about others that removes the required respect, care and empathy. It's one of the risks of awakening, one of the challenges along the way.

I guess the bhakti approach, the more compassionate approach, doesn't have that pitfall so much.

Yes, and that's why there are these different approaches and paths. Some are a better fit for one person than others, and some are a better fit at different stages of the process for a particular person. One map from one teacher says: find the path that fits you best, go all the way, and then do all the others so that you balance it all out.

Thank you.

You're welcome. Thanks for sharing.